Brian Williams Compares Founding Fathers To Terrorists
Not making this up. According to this article here's what Williams told [Andrea] Mitchell during tonight's telecast:
"What would it all matter if proven true? Someone brought up today the first several U.S. presidents were certainly revolutionaries and might have been called 'terrorists' by the British crown, after all."
Blog response has been swift. Michelle has the round up. Comparing our revolution to terrorism is a bastardization of both history and decency. Expect an even more withering attack in the days to come. Good heavens, Brian, it's the fourth of July weekend. Just couldn't help yourself, could ya?
I'd like to add to the pile of facts being assembled by reminding Williams that John Adams, no doubt one of the "terrorists" Williams was talking about, successfully defended, in the face of fierce public opinion, British soldiers accused of firing into a crowd in what came to be known as The Boston Massacre. Here's a quick overview:
Adams knows that the cause of the British soldiers will not be a popular one in a city with a thousand legitimate grievances against the occupying troops. The lawyer understands that taking the case will not only subject him to criticism, but might also jeopardize his legal practice--or even risk the safety of himself and his family. But he believes deeply that every person deserves a defense. He takes on the case without hesitation. For his efforts, he will receive the modest sum of eighteen guineas.
I'm unaware of any terrorist principled enough when it comes to the rule of law to defend his enemy. Successfully.
It was during this case Adams uttered his famous line: "Facts are stubborn things." Obviously Brian Williams disagrees. Nothing's so stubborn a little moral equivalence can't be added to shape facts and truth into his anti-American agenda.
UPDATE: Welcome fellow Michelle Malkin fans! Hope you'll visit again.

































Recent Comments